dealer: be in vegas asian

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents market
Weight: 0.66
, shop
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings drug dealer
Weight: 0.36
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, salesperson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in vegas asian 1.00
be in vegas 0.92
is uk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(shop, is uk)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dealer, be in vegas asian)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(shop, is uk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(shop, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(shop, is uk)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dealer, be in vegas asian)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(dealer, be in vegas asian)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dealer, be in vegas)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(dealer, be in vegas)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dealer, be in vegas)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(dealer, be in vegas)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(dealer, is uk)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dealer, is uk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(dealer, is uk)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dealer, is uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dealer, be in vegas asian)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dealer, be in vegas asian)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shop, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(dealer, be in vegas asian)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(shop, is uk)