dealer: go on drugs inc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents market
Weight: 0.66
, shop
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings drug dealer
Weight: 0.36
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, salesperson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
go on drugs inc 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dealer, go on drugs inc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, go on drugs inc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(dealer, go on drugs inc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(drug dealer, go on drugs inc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, go on drugs inc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(dealer, go on drugs inc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(dealer, go on drugs inc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(dealer, go on drugs inc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dealer, go on drugs inc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dealer, go on drugs inc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(dealer, go on drugs inc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dealer, go on drugs inc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(dealer, go on drugs inc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(drug dealer, go on drugs inc)