dealer: make

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents market
Weight: 0.66
, shop
Weight: 0.61
, user
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings drug dealer
Weight: 0.36
, barber shop
Weight: 0.35
, salesperson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
make 1.00
make money 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dealer, make)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, make money)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(dealer, make)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(drug dealer, make money)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, make money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(dealer, make)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(dealer, make)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(dealer, make)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dealer, make)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dealer, make)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(dealer, make)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(dealer, make)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dealer, make)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(drug dealer, make money)