death valley: get hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.69
, park
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.66
, location
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings valley
Weight: 0.37
, grand canyon
Weight: 0.36
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.35
, central park
Weight: 0.35
, rift valley
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get hot 1.00
is hot 0.96
is hottest place 0.78
be hottest place on earth 0.76
be hottest place in world 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(valley, get hot)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(valley, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(valley, get hot)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(valley, is hot)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(valley, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(death valley, get hot)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(death valley, is hot)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is hot)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(death valley, is hot)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(death valley, is hot)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(death valley, be hottest place on earth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(death valley, be hottest place on earth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be hottest place on earth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(death valley, be hottest place in world)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be hottest place in world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(death valley, be hottest place in world)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(death valley, is hottest place)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(death valley, is hottest place)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is hottest place)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(death valley, be hottest place on earth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(death valley, be hottest place in world)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(death valley, is hottest place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(death valley, get hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(death valley, get hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(valley, get hot)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(death valley, get hot)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(valley, is hot)