death valley: is park important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.69
, park
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.66
, location
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings valley
Weight: 0.37
, grand canyon
Weight: 0.36
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.35
, central park
Weight: 0.35
, rift valley
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is park important 1.00
is park 0.96
is national park important 0.92
is national park 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(death valley, is park important)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(national park, is park)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(death valley, is park important)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(national park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(death valley, is park important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(national park, is park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(national park, is national park)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(park, is national park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(park, is national park)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(national park, is park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(national park, is national park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is park)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is national park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(death valley, is park important)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(national park, is park)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(death valley, is park important)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(national park, is national park)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(death valley, is park important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(grand canyon, is park)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(grand canyon, is park)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(grand canyon, is national park)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(grand canyon, is national park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(death valley, is park important)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(death valley, is park)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(death valley, is park)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(death valley, is park)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(death valley, is national park)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(death valley, is national park)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(death valley, is national park)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is national park important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(death valley, is national park important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(death valley, is national park important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(death valley, is national park important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(death valley, is park important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(national park, is park)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(national park, is national park)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(grand canyon, is park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(grand canyon, is national park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(national park, is park)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(national park, is national park)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(death valley, is park important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, is national park)