death valley: was formd

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.69
, park
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.66
, location
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings valley
Weight: 0.37
, grand canyon
Weight: 0.36
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.35
, central park
Weight: 0.35
, rift valley
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formd 1.00
is xanterra 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is xanterra)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(grand canyon, is xanterra) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(grand canyon, is xanterra)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(death valley, was formd)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(death valley, is xanterra)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(death valley, is xanterra)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(death valley, is xanterra)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(death valley, is xanterra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formd)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(death valley, was formd)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formd) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(grand canyon, is xanterra)