death valley: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.69
, park
Weight: 0.68
, area
Weight: 0.66
, location
Weight: 0.64
, site
Weight: 0.62
Siblings valley
Weight: 0.37
, grand canyon
Weight: 0.36
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.35
, central park
Weight: 0.35
, rift valley
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
be formed 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(death valley, was formed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(death valley, was formed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(national park, was formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(park, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(national park, was formed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(park, was formed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(valley, be formed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(death valley, was formed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(death valley, was formed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(rift valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(rift valley, be formed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(grand canyon, was formed)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(grand canyon, was formed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(yellowstone national park, was formed)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(yellowstone national park, was formed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(valley, be formed)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(valley, be formed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(death valley, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(death valley, be formed)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(death valley, be formed)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(death valley, be formed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(death valley, be formed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(death valley, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(national park, was formed)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(park, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rift valley, be formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(valley, be formed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(grand canyon, was formed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(yellowstone national park, was formed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(national park, was formed)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(death valley, was formed)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(park, was formed)