death: be by predation than better than death by starvation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fatality
Weight: 0.76
, penalty
Weight: 0.66
, trauma
Weight: 0.66
, sorrow
Weight: 0.65
Siblings divorce
Weight: 0.60
, imprisonment
Weight: 0.34
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.34
, execution
Weight: 0.33
, punishment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be by predation than better than death by starvation 1.00
be by predators more natural than death by starvation 0.95
be worse than death 0.82
be considered worse than death 0.81
be like death 0.78
feel like death 0.75
be called death 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(divorce, be considered worse than death)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(divorce, be worse than death)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(divorce, be like death)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(divorce, feel like death)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(divorce, be worse than death) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(divorce, be worse than death)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(divorce, be considered worse than death) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(divorce, be considered worse than death)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(divorce, be like death) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(divorce, be like death)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(divorce, feel like death) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(divorce, feel like death)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(death, be by predators more natural than death by starvation)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(death, be by predators more natural than death by starvation)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(death, be by predators more natural than death by starvation)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predators more natural than death by starvation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(divorce, be considered worse than death)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(divorce, be like death)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(divorce, be worse than death)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(death, be by predation than better than death by starvation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(divorce, feel like death)