debate: be important in politics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discussion
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.61
, contest
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings topic
Weight: 0.33
, battle
Weight: 0.33
, question
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32
, meeting
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in politics 1.00
be about politics 0.95
be about politics popular 0.94
be about politics considered 0.93
is political 0.83
be important in life science 0.79
be important in democracy 0.79
be important in science 0.78
be in balkans important 0.77
be important in okinawa 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(discussion, be about politics)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(debate, be important in politics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(discussion, be about politics considered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(debate, be important in politics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(discussion, be about politics)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(discussion, be about politics considered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about politics considered)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about politics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(battle, be important in okinawa)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(question, be important in life science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(crisis, be in balkans important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(discussion, be about politics)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(discussion, be about politics considered)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(debate, be important in politics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(question, be important in life science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(question, be important in life science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(crisis, be in balkans important)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(crisis, be in balkans important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(question, be important in science)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(question, be important in science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(battle, be important in okinawa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(battle, be important in okinawa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(debate, be important in politics)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(debate, be important in democracy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(debate, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in democracy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(debate, be important in democracy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(debate, be important in democracy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(debate, be important in science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(debate, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(debate, be important in politics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(discussion, be about politics)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(discussion, be about politics considered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(crisis, be in balkans important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(question, be important in life science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(question, be important in science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(battle, be important in okinawa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(discussion, be about politics)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(debate, be important in politics)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(discussion, be about politics considered)