debate: be important in technology

Related concepts

Parents	discussion Weight: 0.64 , forum Weight: 0.61 , contest Weight: 0.60 , issue Weight: 0.59
Siblings	topic Weight: 0.33 , battle Weight: 0.33 , question Weight: 0.33 , crisis Weight: 0.32 , meeting Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in technology	1.00
be important in science	0.81
be important in research	0.80
be in balkans important	0.80
be important in okinawa	0.80
be important in business	0.80
be important in life science	0.79
be important in world	0.79
be important to gilgamesh	0.78
be important 1815	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(debate, be important in technology)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(debate, be important in technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(question, be important in research)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(battle, be important 1815)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(battle, be important in okinawa)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(question, be important in science)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(question, be important in life science)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(crisis, be in balkans important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(debate, be important in technology)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(debate, be important in technology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(crisis, be in balkans important) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(crisis, be in balkans important)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(question, be important in science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(question, be important in science)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(question, be important in life science) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(question, be important in life science)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(battle, be important in okinawa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(battle, be important in okinawa)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(question, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(question, be important in research)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(battle, be important 1815) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(battle, be important 1815)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(debate, be important in technology)

Similarity expansion

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(debate, be important in science)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(debate, be important in world)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(debate, be important in world)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(debate, be important in world)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in world)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(debate, be important in science)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(debate, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(debate, be important in technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(crisis, be in balkans important)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(question, be important in life science)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(question, be important in science)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(battle, be important in okinawa)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(battle, be important 1815)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(question, be important in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(debate, be important in technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)