debate: be in legco work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discussion
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.61
, contest
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings topic
Weight: 0.33
, battle
Weight: 0.33
, question
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32
, meeting
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in legco work 1.00
work 0.96
be in larp 0.78
be in balkans 0.78
be in attila 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(contest, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(debate, be in legco work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(contest, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(contest, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(crisis, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(question, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(battle, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(crisis, be in balkans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(contest, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(debate, be in legco work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(battle, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(battle, work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(question, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(question, work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(crisis, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(crisis, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(crisis, be in balkans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(crisis, be in balkans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(debate, be in legco work)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(debate, work)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(debate, work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(debate, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(debate, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(debate, be in legco work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(contest, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(battle, work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(question, work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(crisis, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(crisis, be in balkans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(debate, be in legco work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(contest, work)