debate: be on halberds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discussion
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.61
, contest
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings topic
Weight: 0.33
, battle
Weight: 0.33
, question
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32
, meeting
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on halberds 1.00
be on halberds confusing 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be on halberds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(debate, be on halberds)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(debate, be on halberds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(debate, be on halberds confusing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(debate, be on halberds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(debate, be on halberds confusing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be on halberds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(debate, be on halberds confusing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(debate, be on halberds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(debate, be on halberds confusing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(debate, be on halberds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(debate, be on halberds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(debate, be on halberds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(debate, be on halberds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(debate, be on halberds)