debate: has quality questions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discussion
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.61
, contest
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings topic
Weight: 0.33
, battle
Weight: 0.33
, question
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32
, meeting
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality questions 1.00
be called questions 0.90
asked questions 0.84
be with question 0.84
have skill testing questions 0.83
have math questions 0.82
need answers 0.78
is answers 0.78
be more important than answers 0.77
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(debate, has quality questions)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(contest, have skill testing questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(debate, has quality questions)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(debate, has quality questions)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(issue, asked questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(debate, has quality questions)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(discussion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(debate, has quality questions)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(contest, have math questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(debate, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(contest, have math questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(issue, asked questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(contest, have skill testing questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(discussion, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(forum, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(contest, have math questions)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(contest, have skill testing questions)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(forum, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(discussion, has quality questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(issue, asked questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(question, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(meeting, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(question, be called questions)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(question, need answers)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(question, be more important than answers)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(question, is answers)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(question, be with question)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(discussion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(debate, has quality questions)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(issue, asked questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(debate, has quality questions)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(contest, have skill testing questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(debate, has quality questions)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(contest, have math questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(debate, has quality questions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(forum, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(debate, has quality questions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(discussion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(debate, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(question, be called questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(question, be called questions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(question, be with question) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(question, be with question)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(question, need answers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(question, need answers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(question, is answers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(question, is answers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(question, be more important than answers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(question, be more important than answers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(meeting, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(meeting, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(question, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(question, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(debate, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(debate, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(debate, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(debate, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(debate, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(issue, asked questions)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(contest, have math questions)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(contest, have skill testing questions)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(question, be called questions)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(question, be with question)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(question, is answers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(question, need answers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(question, be more important than answers)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(meeting, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(question, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality questions)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(issue, asked questions)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(contest, have math questions)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(contest, have skill testing questions)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(discussion, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(debate, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(forum, has quality good)