debate: has trait fun

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discussion
Weight: 0.64
, forum
Weight: 0.61
, contest
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.59
Siblings topic
Weight: 0.33
, battle
Weight: 0.33
, question
Weight: 0.33
, crisis
Weight: 0.32
, meeting
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has trait fun 1.00
has trait taboo 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(debate, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(topic, has trait taboo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(debate, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(topic, has trait taboo)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(topic, has trait taboo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(debate, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(debate, has trait fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(debate, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(debate, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(debate, has trait fun)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(debate, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(debate, has trait fun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(debate, has trait fun)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(topic, has trait taboo)