debt instrument: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents instrument
Weight: 0.80
, obligation
Weight: 0.60
, property
Weight: 0.58
, agreement
Weight: 0.55
Siblings mortgage
Weight: 0.66
, government
Weight: 0.65
, bond
Weight: 0.63
, deed
Weight: 0.59
, negotiable instrument
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(government, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(bond, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(mortgage, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mortgage, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(bond, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(bond, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(government, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(government, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(negotiable instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(negotiable instrument, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(debt instrument, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(debt instrument, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(debt instrument, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mortgage, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bond, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(negotiable instrument, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(government, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(debt instrument, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)