debt: be bad for economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for economy 1.00
be good for economy 0.98
be important to economy 0.93
affect economy 0.91
really impact economy 0.86
affect american economy 0.84
be bad for country 0.84
be good for business 0.81
be good for country 0.80
be for businesses good thing 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(stock, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(stock, be important to economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(stock, be important to economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(loan, affect economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(loan, affect american economy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loan, be important to economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(stock, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(loan, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(loan, be important to economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(loan, affect economy)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(loan, affect economy)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(loan, affect american economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(loan, affect american economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(debt, be bad for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(debt, be bad for country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(debt, be bad for country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for country)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(debt, be good for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for country)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(debt, be for businesses good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(debt, be good for economy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(debt, be good for country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(debt, be good for country)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(debt, be important to economy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for economy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(debt, be good for business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(debt, be important to economy)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for country)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for country)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(debt, be important to economy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(debt, be for businesses good thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(debt, be good for country)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for country)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(debt, be good for country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for country)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(debt, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(debt, be important to economy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(debt, be good for business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(debt, be good for business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(debt, be for businesses good thing)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(debt, be for businesses good thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(debt, be bad for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(stock, be important to economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(loan, be important to economy)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(loan, affect economy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(loan, affect american economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(debt, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(stock, be important to economy)