debt: be cheaper than equity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than equity wso 1.00
be cheaper than equity 1.00
be cheaper form than equity 0.98
be more expensive than equity 0.96
be less expensive than equity 0.96
be better than equity 0.94
be comparatively cheaper form than equity 0.92
be riskier than equity 0.90
be less risky than equity 0.90
be cheaper than debt 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(equity, be cheaper than debt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(equity, be cheaper than debt)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(equity, be cheaper than debt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, be better than equity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be better than equity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(debt, be better than equity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debt, be better than equity)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(equity, be cheaper than debt)