debt: be classified in bankruptcy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be classified in bankruptcy 1.00
be notified of bankruptcy 0.87
be classified as liabilities 0.77
be classified as current liabilities 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be notified of bankruptcy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be classified as current liabilities)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be classified as liabilities)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(creditor, be classified as liabilities)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(creditor, be classified as liabilities)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(creditor, be classified as current liabilities)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(creditor, be classified as current liabilities)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(creditor, be notified of bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(creditor, be notified of bankruptcy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, be classified as liabilities)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(creditor, be classified as current liabilities)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(debt, be classified in bankruptcy)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(creditor, be notified of bankruptcy)