debt: be comparatively cheaper form than equity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be comparatively cheaper form than equity 1.00
be cheaper form than equity 0.94
be comparatively cheaper form of finance 0.93
be cheaper than equity wso 0.92
be cheaper than equity 0.92
be comparatively cheaper form of financing 0.92
be less expensive than equity 0.91
be more expensive than equity 0.90
be better than equity 0.87
be less risky than equity 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form of finance)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form of financing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form of finance)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form of financing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form of finance)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, be better than equity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form of financing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form of finance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be better than equity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(debt, be better than equity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form of financing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debt, be better than equity)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(debt, be comparatively cheaper form than equity)