debt: be included in enterprise value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be included in enterprise value 1.00
be part of enterprise value 0.94
be added to enterprise value 0.93
add to enterprise value 0.92
be to value 0.82
is value 0.82
have value 0.81
be to value important 0.81
has value 0.80
represent value 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(stock, have value)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(debt, be included in enterprise value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(stock, have value)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(stock, have value)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(equity, is value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(stock, have value)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(equity, is value)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(equity, is value)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loan, be to value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(loan, be to value)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loan, be to value important)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(loan, be to value important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(debt, be included in enterprise value)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(debt, be part of enterprise value)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(debt, be part of enterprise value)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(debt, be part of enterprise value)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(debt, add to enterprise value)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(debt, be part of enterprise value)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(debt, add to enterprise value)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(debt, be added to enterprise value)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(debt, add to enterprise value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(debt, add to enterprise value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(debt, be added to enterprise value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(debt, be added to enterprise value)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be added to enterprise value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(debt, be included in enterprise value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(stock, have value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(equity, is value)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, be to value)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be to value important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(debt, be included in enterprise value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(stock, have value)