debt: be less risky than equity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less risky than equity 1.00
be riskier than equity 0.96
be less expensive than equity 0.94
be more expensive than equity 0.93
be more risky than debt 0.92
be better than equity 0.91
be cheaper than equity wso 0.90
be cheaper than equity 0.90
be riskier than debt 0.90
be cheaper form than equity 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(equity, be more risky than debt)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(equity, be more risky than debt)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than debt)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(equity, be riskier than debt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(debt, be better than equity)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, be better than equity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be better than equity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper form than equity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debt, be better than equity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(equity, be more risky than debt)