debt: be riskier than equity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be riskier than equity 1.00
be less risky than equity 0.96
be riskier than debt 0.94
be riskier than bonds 0.93
tend riskier than bonds 0.91
be more expensive than equity 0.90
be less expensive than equity 0.90
be cheaper than equity wso 0.90
be cheaper than equity 0.90
be better than equity 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stock, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be riskier than equity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(stock, be riskier than bonds)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(stock, be riskier than bonds)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(equity, be riskier than debt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(stock, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(equity, be riskier than debt)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equity, be riskier than bonds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(equity, be riskier than bonds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(debt, be riskier than equity)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(debt, be better than equity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(debt, be better than equity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debt, be better than equity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(debt, be more expensive than equity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(debt, be better than equity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(debt, be cheaper than equity wso)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(debt, be less expensive than equity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(debt, be less risky than equity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(debt, be less risky than equity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(debt, be riskier than equity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(stock, be riskier than bonds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than bonds)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(equity, be riskier than debt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(debt, be riskier than equity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(stock, be riskier than bonds)