debt: ebitda ratio important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
ebitda ratio important 1.00
is ebitda 0.94
is earnings ratio important 0.88
is earnings ratio 0.88
be to equity ratio important 0.85
is ratio 0.85
be to income ratio important 0.85
be to equity ratio 0.85
be to income ratio 0.84
gdp ratio important 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(equity, is ratio)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(equity, is ratio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(equity, is ratio)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(debt, ebitda ratio important)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(debt, be to equity ratio important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(debt, be to income ratio important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(debt, be to equity ratio important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(debt, be to income ratio important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(debt, gdp ratio important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(debt, gdp ratio important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(debt, be to equity ratio important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(debt, be to income ratio important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(debt, gdp ratio important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(debt, gdp ratio important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(debt, be to income ratio important)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(debt, be to equity ratio important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(debt, ebitda ratio important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(debt, ebitda ratio important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(debt, ebitda ratio important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(equity, is ratio)