debt: has quality asset

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock
Weight: 0.64
, mortgage
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, obligation
Weight: 0.58
Siblings creditor
Weight: 0.64
, equity
Weight: 0.64
, loan
Weight: 0.63
, borrowing
Weight: 0.59
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality asset 1.00
be considered asset 0.92
share of is asset 0.90
has quality assets 0.89
be to asset ratio important 0.87
be to asset ratio 0.86
differ from asset 0.84
be considered assets 0.81
be considered liquid assets 0.79
is good investment 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(stock, be considered liquid assets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(debt, has quality asset)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(stock, be considered liquid assets)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(stock, be considered liquid assets)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(equity, is good investment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(borrowing, has quality asset)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(loan, has quality assets)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(equity, differ from asset)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(loan, be considered assets)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(stock, be considered liquid assets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(debt, has quality asset)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(borrowing, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(borrowing, has quality asset)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(loan, has quality assets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(loan, has quality assets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(equity, differ from asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(equity, differ from asset)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(loan, be considered assets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(loan, be considered assets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(equity, is good investment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(equity, is good investment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(debt, has quality asset)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(debt, be considered asset)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(debt, be considered asset)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(debt, be to asset ratio important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(debt, be considered asset)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(debt, be to asset ratio important)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(debt, be considered asset)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(debt, be to asset ratio important)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(debt, be to asset ratio important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(debt, has quality asset)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(stock, be considered liquid assets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(equity, differ from asset)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loan, be considered assets)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(loan, has quality assets)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(borrowing, has quality asset)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(equity, is good investment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(debt, has quality asset) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(stock, be considered liquid assets)