debtor: has quality assets

Property	Similarity
has quality assets	1.00
has quality asset	0.89
be classified as assets	0.88
is current asset	0.83
is liabilities	0.78

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(debtor, is liabilities)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(debtor, be classified as assets)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(debtor, is current asset)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(debtor, has quality asset)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(debtor, has quality asset)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(debtor, is current asset)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(debtor, has quality asset)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(debtor, is liabilities)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(debtor, has quality asset)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(debtor, be classified as assets)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(debtor, is liabilities)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(debtor, is current asset)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(debtor, is liabilities)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(debtor, be classified as assets)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(debtor, be classified as assets)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(debtor, has quality assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(debtor, is current asset)

Parents	individual Weight: 0.56 , amount Weight: 0.53 , person Weight: 0.53 , third party Weight: 0.52
Siblings	creditor Weight: 0.34 , defendant Weight: 0.32 , one person Weight: 0.31 , buyer Weight: 0.31 , homeless person Weight: 0.31

debtor: has quality assets

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings