debugging: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.55
, feature
Weight: 0.52
, tool
Weight: 0.50
, function
Weight: 0.49
Siblings recursion
Weight: 0.32
, verification
Weight: 0.32
, configuration
Weight: 0.32
, parallelism
Weight: 0.32
, syntax
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
has quality worth 0.85
is great 0.81
has quality difference 0.80
has quality questions 0.76
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(debugging, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(debugging, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(debugging, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(debugging, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(debugging, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(debugging, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(function, has quality difference)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tool, is great)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(tool, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tool, is great)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tool, is best)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(function, has quality difference)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(recursion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(parallelism, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(verification, has quality questions)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(tool, is great)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(tool, is best)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(function, has quality difference)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(debugging, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(recursion, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(recursion, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(parallelism, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(parallelism, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(verification, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(verification, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(debugging, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(debugging, has quality questions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(debugging, has quality questions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(debugging, has quality questions)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(debugging, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(verification, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(parallelism, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(recursion, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(function, has quality difference)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is great)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(debugging, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tool, is best)