decay: is first order process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.61
, hazard
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, condition
Weight: 0.53
, sign
Weight: 0.52
Siblings beta decay
Weight: 0.57
, tooth decay
Weight: 0.36
, alpha decay
Weight: 0.34
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.34
, decomposition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is first order process 1.00
is order process 0.97
is important process 0.87
be in order 0.86
has physical part process 0.83
be related to process 0.83
evaluation of be can process 0.80
evaluation of be can ongoing process 0.80
is money order 0.80
has state first 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sign, be in order)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decay, is first order process)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sign, is money order)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decay, is first order process)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decay, is first order process)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decay, is first order process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(sign, be in order)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sign, is money order)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(sign, be in order)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sign, is money order)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, evaluation of be can process)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is important process)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has physical part process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(sign, be in order)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(decay, is first order process)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sign, is money order)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(decay, is first order process)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(decay, is first order process)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(process, evaluation of be can process)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(decay, is first order process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(decomposition, has physical part process)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(decomposition, is important process)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is important process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(decay, is first order process)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(decay, is order process)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(decay, is order process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(decay, is order process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(decay, is order process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(decay, has state first)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(decay, has state first)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(decay, has state first)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(decay, has state first)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decay, is first order process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sign, be in order)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sign, is money order)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(decomposition, has physical part process)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(decomposition, is important process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sign, be in order)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can process)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(process, evaluation of be can ongoing process)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decay, is first order process)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sign, is money order)