decision: be based on expected costs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents recommendation
Weight: 0.76
, move
Weight: 0.66
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, approach
Weight: 0.59
Siblings judgment
Weight: 0.65
, withdrawal
Weight: 0.61
, roe
Weight: 0.55
, boycott
Weight: 0.52
, supreme
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be based on expected costs 1.00
be based on costs 0.94
be in costs 0.87
be based on benefits 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(move, be in costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(decision, be based on expected costs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(move, be in costs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(move, be in costs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(move, be in costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(decision, be based on expected costs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(decision, be based on expected costs)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(decision, be based on benefits)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(decision, be based on benefits)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(decision, be based on benefits)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(decision, be based on benefits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(decision, be based on expected costs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(decision, be based on expected costs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(move, be in costs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(decision, be based on expected costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(move, be in costs)