deck: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, option
Weight: 0.56
, application
Weight: 0.56
Siblings patio
Weight: 0.60
, balcony
Weight: 0.56
, pontoon
Weight: 0.33
, arch
Weight: 0.33
, stair
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is expensive bondarenko 1.00
is expensive now 0.94
is expensive right now 0.86
is cheaper 0.85
cost money 0.77
is attractive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(option, is expensive now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is expensive right now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(feature, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(option, is expensive bondarenko) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(application, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive now)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is expensive right now)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(option, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(application, cost money)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(feature, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive now)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(option, is cheaper)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(option, is expensive right now)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, cost money)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(feature, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pontoon, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(arch, is attractive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(option, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deck, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(application, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deck, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(option, is expensive now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deck, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(option, is expensive bondarenko) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deck, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is expensive right now) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deck, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(option, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deck, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(feature, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deck, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(application, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(deck, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pontoon, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pontoon, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(arch, is attractive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(arch, is attractive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(deck, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(deck, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(option, is expensive now)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is expensive right now)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pontoon, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(arch, is attractive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(option, is expensive bondarenko)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(application, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(option, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(option, is expensive now)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is expensive right now)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(option, is cheaper)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(application, cost money)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(deck, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)