decline: be pointless bench

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, problem
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.57
, book
Weight: 0.52
Siblings drop
Weight: 0.36
, decrease
Weight: 0.36
, rise
Weight: 0.34
, erosion
Weight: 0.34
, contraction
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pointless bench 1.00
bench 0.89
be easier than bench 0.86
be easier than flat bench 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(decline, be pointless bench)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(decline, bench)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(decline, bench)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(decline, bench)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(decline, be easier than bench)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(decline, be easier than flat bench)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(decline, be easier than bench)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(decline, be easier than flat bench)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(decline, be easier than flat bench)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(decline, be easier than flat bench)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(decline, bench)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(decline, be easier than bench)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(decline, be easier than bench)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(decline, be pointless bench)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(decline, be pointless bench) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(decline, be pointless bench)