decomposition: be essential in ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, decay
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.34
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be essential in ecosystem 1.00
be important in ecosystem 0.96
be important to ecosystem 0.96
be important for ecosystem 0.96
be vital in ecosystems 0.91
be important in forest ecosystem 0.90
be important to forest ecosystem 0.89
be essential to life 0.84
be important in environment 0.81
be important to environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(decomposition, be essential to life)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be essential to life)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be essential to life)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(decomposition, be essential to life)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(decay, be important in ecosystem)