decomposition: be important in computer science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, decay
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.34
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in computer science 1.00
is important computing 0.78
is computing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in computer science)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is important computing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is computing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(decomposition, is important computing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(decomposition, is computing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(decomposition, is computing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(decomposition, is important computing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is computing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is important computing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in computer science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(decomposition, be important in computer science)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in computer science)