decomposition: be important to ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, decay
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.34
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to ecosystem 1.00
be important in ecosystem 1.00
be important for ecosystem 0.99
be essential in ecosystem 0.96
be important to forest ecosystem 0.92
be important in forest ecosystem 0.92
be vital in ecosystems 0.89
be important to environment 0.81
be important in environment 0.81
be important to organisms in habitats 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(decay, be important in ecosystem)