decomposition: be important to forest ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, decay
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.34
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to forest ecosystem 1.00
be important in forest ecosystem 1.00
be important to ecosystem 0.92
be important in ecosystem 0.92
be important for ecosystem 0.92
be essential in ecosystem 0.89
be vital in ecosystems 0.87
be important to organisms in habitats 0.80
be faster in rainforests 0.79
be faster in tropical rainforests 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(decomposition, be faster in rainforests)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(decomposition, be faster in rainforests)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be faster in rainforests)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(decomposition, be faster in tropical rainforests)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be faster in tropical rainforests)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(decomposition, be faster in tropical rainforests)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be faster in tropical rainforests)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be faster in rainforests)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(decay, be important in ecosystem)