decomposition: be important to organisms in habitats

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, decay
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.34
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to organisms in habitats 1.00
be important to organisms 0.92
be important for organisms 0.91
be important for living organisms 0.89
be vital in ecosystems 0.85
be important in forest ecosystem 0.80
be important to forest ecosystem 0.80
be important in ecosystem 0.79
be important to ecosystem 0.79
be important for ecosystem 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important for organisms)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important for living organisms)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important for living organisms)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important for living organisms)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important for organisms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important for living organisms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important for organisms)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important for organisms)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(decay, be important in ecosystem)