decomposition: be vital in ecosystems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, decay
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.34
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vital in ecosystems 1.00
be essential in ecosystem 0.91
be important in ecosystem 0.90
be important to ecosystem 0.89
be important for ecosystem 0.89
be important in forest ecosystem 0.87
be important to forest ecosystem 0.87
be important to organisms in habitats 0.85
be important in environment 0.80
be important to environment 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(decay, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(decay, be important in ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be important to environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to organisms in habitats)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in ecosystem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in forest ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to forest ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(decomposition, be important to environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be essential in ecosystem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be important to environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important for ecosystem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important in environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be vital in ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(decay, be important in ecosystem)