decomposition: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, decay
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.34
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
is important process 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fermentation, has physical part process)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fermentation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fermentation, has physical part process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(combustion, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(combustion, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(decomposition, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is important process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(decomposition, is important process)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is important process)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(decomposition, is important process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(decomposition, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fermentation, has physical part process)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(combustion, has physical part process)