decomposition: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, reaction
Weight: 0.61
, function
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.56
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.34
, decay
Weight: 0.34
, oxidation
Weight: 0.34
, digestion
Weight: 0.33
, combustion
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
be considered change 0.81
is chemical change 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(decay, has quality change)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(digestion, has quality change)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(combustion, has quality change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(digestion, is chemical change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(combustion, is chemical change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(decay, is chemical change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is chemical change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(decay, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(decay, has quality change)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(digestion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(digestion, has quality change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(combustion, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(combustion, has quality change)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(oxidation, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(oxidation, has quality change)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(oxidation, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(oxidation, is chemical change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(digestion, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(digestion, is chemical change)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(decay, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(decay, is chemical change)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(combustion, is chemical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(combustion, is chemical change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(decomposition, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(decomposition, be considered change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(decomposition, be considered change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, be considered change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(decomposition, be considered change)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(decomposition, is chemical change)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, is chemical change)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(decomposition, is chemical change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(decomposition, is chemical change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(decomposition, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(decay, has quality change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(digestion, has quality change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(combustion, has quality change)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(oxidation, has quality change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(oxidation, is chemical change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digestion, is chemical change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(decay, is chemical change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(decomposition, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(combustion, is chemical change)