deductible: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, health insurance
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.34
, tuition
Weight: 0.33
, operating expense
Weight: 0.33
, fee
Weight: 0.33
, deduction
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality right 0.88
improve quality 0.81
be for service bad 0.78
be bad for game 0.78
improve quality of education 0.77
has quality function 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(health insurance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(provision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(health insurance, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cost, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(cost, has quality function)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality right)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(item, be bad for game)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality right)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(item, be bad for game)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cost, has quality function)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fee, be for service bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(health insurance, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(provision, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(health insurance, has quality right)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(item, be bad for game)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(cost, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(operating expense, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(income tax, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tuition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tuition, improve quality)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(fee, be for service bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(fee, be for service bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(deductible, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deductible, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality right)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fee, be for service bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality of education)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cost, has quality function)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality right)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(deductible, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(item, be bad for game)