deer: has physical part antler

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.76
, mammal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
Siblings moose
Weight: 0.70
, elk
Weight: 0.67
, bobcat
Weight: 0.39
, cougar
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part antler 1.00
has physical part antlers 0.91
shed antler velvet 0.91
use antlers 0.87
need antlers 0.87
have bigger antlers 0.86
have fur on antlers 0.86
have large sets of antlers 0.85
have sets of antlers 0.85
drop antlers 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(moose, drop antlers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(elk, drop antlers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(moose, has physical part antlers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(elk, has physical part antlers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(elk, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(elk, has physical part antlers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(moose, has physical part antlers)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(moose, has physical part antlers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(moose, drop antlers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(moose, drop antlers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(elk, drop antlers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(elk, drop antlers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(deer, has physical part antler)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(deer, use antlers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(deer, drop antlers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(deer, use antlers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antlers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(deer, drop antlers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(deer, has physical part antlers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(deer, has physical part antlers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(deer, has physical part antlers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(deer, use antlers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(deer, drop antlers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(deer, need antlers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(deer, need antlers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(deer, use antlers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(deer, need antlers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(deer, drop antlers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(deer, need antlers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(deer, has physical part antler)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(moose, has physical part antlers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(elk, has physical part antlers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(moose, drop antlers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(deer, has physical part antler)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(elk, drop antlers)