:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(moose, drop antlers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(elk, drop antlers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(elk, grow antlers)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(deer, is moose)
Similarity expansion
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(deer, use antlers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(deer, drop antlers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(deer, use antlers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(deer, drop antlers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(deer, use antlers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(deer, need antlers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(deer, grow antlers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(deer, grow antlers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(deer, need antlers)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(deer, use antlers)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(deer, is moose)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(moose, drop antlers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(elk, grow antlers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(deer, is moose)
⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(elk, drop antlers)