deer: rub on trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
Siblings moose
Weight: 0.70
, elk
Weight: 0.67
, bobcat
Weight: 0.39
, cougar
Weight: 0.39
, coyote
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
rub on trees 1.00
eat moss 0.76
eat grass 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(elk, rub on trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(elk, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(elk, rub on trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(deer, rub on trees)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(deer, eat moss)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(deer, eat moss)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(deer, eat moss)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(deer, eat grass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(deer, eat grass)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(deer, eat grass)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(deer, eat moss)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(deer, eat grass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(deer, rub on trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deer, rub on trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(deer, rub on trees)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(elk, rub on trees)