defendant: remove to federal court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.60
, official
Weight: 0.60
, operator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings prosecutor
Weight: 0.60
, juror
Weight: 0.36
, victim
Weight: 0.35
, one person
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
remove to federal court 1.00
remove to court 0.94
prefer federal court 0.89
prefer court 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(defendant, remove to federal court)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(defendant, remove to court)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(defendant, remove to court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(defendant, remove to court)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(defendant, remove to court)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defendant, prefer court)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defendant, prefer court)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(defendant, prefer federal court)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(defendant, prefer court)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(defendant, prefer court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(defendant, remove to federal court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(defendant, remove to federal court)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(defendant, remove to federal court)