defendant: wear glasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, child
Weight: 0.62
, act
Weight: 0.60
, official
Weight: 0.60
, operator
Weight: 0.59
Siblings prosecutor
Weight: 0.60
, juror
Weight: 0.36
, victim
Weight: 0.35
, one person
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear glasses 1.00
wear shirts 0.80
wear white shirts 0.80
wear shirt 0.79
wear white shirt 0.79
wear headphones in court 0.79
wear suits 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(defendant, wear glasses)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(defendant, wear shirt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(defendant, wear shirts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(defendant, wear suits)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear shirts)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear shirt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(defendant, wear shirts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(defendant, wear shirt)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear suits)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(defendant, wear suits)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear headphones in court)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear white shirts)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(defendant, wear white shirt)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear shirts)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear suits)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear shirt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(defendant, wear glasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(defendant, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(defendant, wear glasses)