defense mechanism: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, behavior
Weight: 0.56
, attack
Weight: 0.48
, species
Weight: 0.48
, way
Weight: 0.48
Siblings denial
Weight: 0.68
, dissociation
Weight: 0.49
, nervous system
Weight: 0.32
, immune response
Weight: 0.32
, phagocytosis
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worse 0.87
is quality 0.87
has quality help 0.86
has quality system 0.82
have really bad tracking 0.76
has quality spot 0.76
has quality function 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(way, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(attack, have really bad tracking)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(attack, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality spot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(way, has quality help)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(attack, have really bad tracking)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(species, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(process, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(species, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(way, has quality help)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(attack, has quality spot)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(process, is quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(attack, have really bad tracking)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dissociation, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dissociation, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(nervous system, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(attack, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(species, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(process, is quality)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(attack, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(way, has quality help)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(attack, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(attack, have really bad tracking)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(attack, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(nervous system, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dissociation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(dissociation, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(denial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dissociation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(dissociation, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nervous system, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(nervous system, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality function)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(nervous system, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(nervous system, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(defense mechanism, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(way, has quality help)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(attack, has quality spot)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(attack, have really bad tracking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dissociation, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dissociation, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(denial, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality worse)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(nervous system, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(attack, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(attack, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(attack, has quality spot)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(attack, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(species, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(way, has quality help)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(process, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(defense mechanism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(attack, have really bad tracking)