defense: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, weakness
Weight: 0.61
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, sector
Weight: 0.58
Siblings offense
Weight: 0.33
, midfield
Weight: 0.33
, aviation
Weight: 0.32
, linebacker
Weight: 0.32
, third base
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality worse 0.84
be great 0.80
feel good 0.80
has quality news 0.79
is public good 0.78
is best 0.76
has quality virtue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(position, feel good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(weakness, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(weakness, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality worse)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(weakness, has quality virtue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(position, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sector, has quality news)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality virtue)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sector, has quality news)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(position, feel good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(weakness, has quality worse)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(offense, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(sector, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(weakness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(sector, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(position, feel good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(weakness, has quality worse)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(weakness, has quality virtue)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(defense, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(offense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(offense, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(defense, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(defense, is public good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(defense, is public good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(defense, is public good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense, be great)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(defense, be great)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(defense, is best)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(defense, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(defense, is public good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(defense, be great)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(defense, be great)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(defense, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(defense, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(defense, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality worse)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality virtue)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(position, feel good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(offense, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality worse)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(weakness, has quality virtue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(position, feel good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(defense, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(sector, has quality news)