definition: be important in research

Related concepts

Parents	concept Weight: 0.68 , standard Weight: 0.65 , proposition Weight: 0.63 , action Weight: 0.61
Siblings	schema Weight: 0.62 , queer Weight: 0.48 , interpretation Weight: 0.34 , guideline Weight: 0.33 , resolution Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in research	1.00
is research	0.96
research	0.95
be important in psychology research	0.88
be important in science	0.82
be necessary in study	0.81
be necessary in study of communication	0.78
be used by researchers	0.76
be important in business	0.76
be important in engineering	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(definition, be important in research)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(standard, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(definition, be important in research)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(action, research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(definition, be important in research)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(action, is research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(definition, be important in research)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(action, is research)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(action, research)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(standard, be important in business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(standard, be important in engineering)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(action, is research)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(action, research)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in engineering)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important in research)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(guideline, be used by researchers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(action, research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(definition, be important in research)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(action, is research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(definition, be important in research)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(standard, be important in engineering) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(definition, be important in research)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(standard, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(definition, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(interpretation, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(interpretation, be important in research)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(guideline, be used by researchers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(guideline, be used by researchers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(definition, be important in research)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(definition, be important in psychology research)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(definition, be important in psychology research)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(definition, be important in science)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(definition, be important in psychology research)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(definition, be necessary in study)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(definition, be important in science)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(definition, be important in science)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in psychology research)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in science)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(definition, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(action, is research)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(action, research)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(standard, be important in business)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(standard, be important in engineering)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(interpretation, be important in research)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(guideline, be used by researchers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(action, is research)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(action, research)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(standard, be important in business)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(definition, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(standard, be important in engineering)