definition: be necessary in study of communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.68
, standard
Weight: 0.65
, proposition
Weight: 0.63
, action
Weight: 0.61
Siblings schema
Weight: 0.62
, queer
Weight: 0.48
, interpretation
Weight: 0.34
, guideline
Weight: 0.33
, resolution
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be necessary in study of communication 1.00
be necessary in study 0.91
be important in communication 0.89
be needed in data communication 0.88
be important in data communication 0.87
be important in communications 0.80
be necessary in science 0.79
be important in research 0.78
is necessary 0.77
be important in psychology research 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(standard, be important in communications)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(standard, be necessary in science)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(standard, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(action, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(action, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(standard, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(concept, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(standard, be necessary in science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(standard, be important in communications)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(standard, be necessary in science)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in data communication)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(standard, be important in communications)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(standard, is necessary)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concept, is necessary)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(action, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important in research)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important in communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(standard, be important in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(standard, be needed in data communication)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(standard, be important in communications)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(standard, be necessary in science)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(standard, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(action, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(interpretation, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(interpretation, be important in communication)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(interpretation, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(interpretation, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(definition, be necessary in study)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(definition, be necessary in study)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(definition, is necessary)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(definition, is necessary)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(definition, is necessary)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in research)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(definition, be important in research)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(definition, be important in psychology research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(definition, be important in psychology research)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(definition, is necessary)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(definition, be important in research)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(definition, be important in research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(definition, be important in psychology research)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(definition, be important in psychology research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(action, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(standard, is necessary)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary in science)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(standard, be important in communications)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(interpretation, be important in communication)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interpretation, be important in research)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(standard, be needed in data communication)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(action, is necessary)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(standard, is necessary)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(standard, be important in data communication)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, be necessary in science)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(definition, be necessary in study of communication)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(standard, be important in communications)