deflation: be bad for banks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for banks 1.00
be bad for borrowers 0.82
be bad for economy 0.80
be bad 0.78
be bad thing in economy 0.78
is bad tutor2u 0.77
be bad for debtors 0.77
be bad for country 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(problem, be bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(problem, be bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(problem, be bad)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad thing in economy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for borrowers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for country)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad thing in economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for country)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for debtors)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad thing in economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for borrowers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for borrowers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad thing in economy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for debtors)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(deflation, be bad for debtors)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(deflation, is bad tutor2u)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for borrowers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(deflation, be bad for debtors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(deflation, be bad for banks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(problem, be bad)