deflation: be regarded as worse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, risk
Weight: 0.51
, problem
Weight: 0.50
, challenge
Weight: 0.46
Siblings bubble
Weight: 0.32
, inequality
Weight: 0.31
, bubble bath
Weight: 0.31
, hangover
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regarded as worse 1.00
be regarded worse 0.99
be considered bad 0.85
has quality worse 0.80
be considered bad thing 0.80
be worse for economy 0.78
be considered thing 0.78
be seen as problem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hangover, has quality worse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(hangover, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hangover, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(deflation, be regarded worse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be regarded worse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(deflation, be regarded worse)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(deflation, be considered bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(deflation, be regarded worse)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(deflation, be considered thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(deflation, be considered bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(deflation, be seen as problem)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(deflation, be considered thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(deflation, be considered bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(deflation, be considered thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(deflation, be seen as problem)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(deflation, has quality worse)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(deflation, has quality worse)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(deflation, has quality worse)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(deflation, has quality worse)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(deflation, be considered bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(deflation, be seen as problem)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(deflation, be worse for economy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be considered bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be considered thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be seen as problem)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be considered bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(deflation, be regarded as worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(deflation, be regarded as worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hangover, has quality worse)